How is 'count compliance' maintained during shift changes?

• A. By relying on memory of counts from the prior shift.
• B. Counts at designated times, cross-checking with the preceding shift, and documenting discrepancies.
• C. Count only at end of shift.
• D. Document counts only when mismatches occur.

Answer: (B)

Structured, verifiable counting during shift changes maintains inmate accountability. By performing counts at designated times, staff create regular checkpoints rather than relying on memory, which can be unreliable. Each count is then cross-checked with the preceding shift’s numbers, helping catch any discrepancies as the handoff occurs. If a difference is found, it is promptly documented with details (where, when, who, and what) and investigated to locate any missing inmates or correct the record. This approach also creates a clear audit trail for safety and compliance. Relying on memory, counting only at the end of a shift, or documenting counts only when mismatches occur undermine ongoing accuracy and timely resolution.